Stay Signed In
Do you want to access your site more quickly on this computer? Check this box, and your username and password will be remembered for two weeks. Click logout to turn this off.
Stay Safe
Do not check this box if you are using a public computer. You don't want anyone seeing your personal info or messing with your site.
you regulars on justmyopinion (theres over 1000 of you who keep coming back regular!) know that i luv 2 go off on a tangent,maybe type alot of controversial points just 2 provoke people, which is why i have a things 2 moan about page, which, as you can see, has had alot more heart & soul thrown in2 it than the 'things 2 rave about' which isn't up 2 my standards- coz i know you lot luv me when im happy, but ADORE me when i'm fucked off. so, here, i slag off my pet h8 thats nigglin away at me this week! so, this week its...
right this is my number 1 gripe- the size 0 debate! now, as a weara of the size 0 jeans, you may be surprised to learn that i am NOT bulimic, anorexic, body dysmorphic, undergoing chemotherapy or lying thru my teeth! i have a 24 1/2 inch waist which is apparently the size of that of a 7yo child. there must be some bloody fat 7yr olds around thats all i can say!
"size 0 should be banned! curves all the way!"
hang on hang on. what about those of us who are not fortunate enough to be blessed with the average (its a 14) build and so cannot just pop into any shop we fancy and pick out what we like? we are limited as it is, i can only buy jeans in gap and wrangler and even that usually ends in "the waists too big! the legs are too long! the backs too wide!" so if you banned size 0 where would that leave me? i would be paying a bomb to ave specially made trousers which takes the piss because id have to pay loads more than someone who is a size 12 yet my trousers would take up less material! end of the day guys, a size 0 is actually a size 4, wehich 10yrs ago woz a size 6! the government stupidly got more generous with sizes to massage peoples ego's so people think theyre smaller than they actually are, which brings me onto a related subject- obesity. 1 in 20 women are now clinically obese. 1 in 3000 are size 0. which one would you say needs more attention according to tjose statistics? why is every1 slagging off the fit people who take care of themselves (most size 0s do, we cant help being small same as you cant help being a lardarse... well you can your just greedy) when there are fat things that resemble overgrown balls of playdough waddling down our streets that apparently women!?! its obscene and it makes me SO angry! im 5ft3, of athletic build, 30B chest, 31inch inside leg. how stupid would i look as a size 14? id look like a bullfrog! size 0 is NOT unhealthy if its your natural size! obesity is the issue in britain- taking smaller sizes off the shelves is NOT going to motivate people to slim! it seems the fat people are rewarded with clothes lines such as evans and the plus sizes, wheras if your slim theres no bloody clothes in your size! yes, theres the petite range but even those the smallest is a size 6 and the legs are too short- people, NORMAL PEOPLE not super models, with tiny hips and long legs do exist, so therefor the size 0 does have purpous other than to encourage the press to find something else to harp on about. so stop being so jealous with your love handles (face it- its FAT, not CURVES) and 6 pack of rolls, shut up, leave us alone and find something importent to whine about. i typed all this munching a box of roses chocolates. the calory packed orange cremes are the best.
Back To Home Page
